The Allied dimension of Afghanistan policy often goes ignored, but no longer thanks to a stand-out post on Security Scholar blog:
"If the current state of relations between the US and Pakistan—the determinant of the broader relationship between the Coalition and Pakistan—continues, what does this mean for Australian operations overseas? As our Prime Minister and others have observed, this episode will likely leave our Mentoring Task Force mission of training the Afghan National Army relatively undisturbed until the withdrawal of 2014. On the other hand, if continued Pakistani intransigence leads to the US adopting a more counterterrorism-centric approach (along the line of Joe Biden’s light footprint plan), there is a good chance Australia’s Special Operations Task Group (SOTG) mission will be affected. At present, the main focus of the SOTG is disrupting insurgent networks in and around the province of Uruzgan. To date, they have also conducted operations in Kandahar involving the targeting and capture/killing of insurgent leaders. Being under US command, should the US mission increase targeting of al-Qaeda elements in the AfPak region, it is not too difficult to envisage that the SOTG would follow suit. With increased operational tempo (in April alone, the latest rotation of SOTG has produced results here, here and here), there has been speculation that we have physically and mentally exhausted our SAS personnel."
To this day, they have moreover led operations in Kandahar including the targeting and catch and slaughtering of guerilla go-to people.
Posted by: roulette en ligne | October 24, 2011 at 02:32 PM
Impressive blog! -Arron
Posted by: rc helicopter reviews | December 21, 2011 at 05:27 AM
Thanks for the informations.
Posted by: serrurier garges les gonesse | January 09, 2012 at 08:50 AM
Being neutral is always the best policy. But ofcourse if you want to spread the hegemony then you must have your own policy with other country.
Posted by: Online Shopping | January 28, 2012 at 05:40 AM